Trust & security

Answers you can defend. Data that stays yours.

A tool that might quietly invent a requirement is useless in a safety review. Adducia is built so the engineer stays in control and can always check the work.

How it earns trust

Source-backed by construction Every artifact ID and claim in an answer is checked against the underlying graph built from your documents. It will not invent a requirement, a standard, or an artifact number. The source is attached so you can verify it yourself.
Honest about its limits When the documents don't support an answer, Adducia says there is no source-backed answer instead of guessing. A confident wrong answer is the most dangerous thing a safety tool can produce, so it is built not to give one.
Your data stays yours Pilots run on your own documents, under NDA, in a private workspace that only your team can open. Your documents are used to build your graph and answer your questions, never to train models, and they are deleted when the pilot ends. Export-controlled or classified material (ITAR, EAR, CUI) never comes to us; that runs in your own cloud tenant or on your own hardware. No telemetry. Anything shown publicly, including any demo, uses synthetic data that is clearly labeled as such.
Human in the loop Low-confidence reads and anything pulled from a diagram are flagged for review rather than silently merged into the graph. The engineer decides what to trust. Adducia's job is to do the finding, not to replace the judgment.
This site itself is a static page with no backend, no database, and no access to any program data. Formal security attestations will follow as we work with design partners; if you have specific requirements, raise them when you get in touch and we will speak to them directly.

Next step

Have a security requirement in mind?

Tell us how your team needs to handle controlled data, and we'll walk through how Adducia fits.

Get in touch